Starting the Informal Probate Process in Minnesota

Posted on September 22, 2015 by jlawyer

If you want to probate a simple estate involving limited property, ask your lawyer if you can initiate the informal probate process. An informal probate is a fairly straightforward approach.

As for the general requirements, you’ll need to first check with your lawyer or county probate court because some Minnesota counties allow you to initiate the probate process online while others insist you do so in person. Here’s a quick review of what you and your attorney must include in the application to begin probate in this manner.

Information That Must Be Included in Your MN Informal Probate Application

Clear statement about your identity. You must tell the court what your interest is in the proceedings – whether you’re a spouse, child, personal representative or another party;
Specific data identifying the decedent. Be sure to include this person’s birth and death dates, along with the county and state s/he was living in at the time of death;
Provide contact data for all close relatives. In other words, list the names and addresses of the deceased person’s spouse, as well as his/her children, heirs – or other people named in any Will that may have been found. Also, if any of the children are minors, you need to list their ages;
Note where the decedent was living if his/her formal domicile was not MN at the time of death. This informs the court of the proper venue for probating the estate;
Identify the personal representative, if you have this information. Be sure to provide this individual’s address, too;
Include information about other related filings. If you know or believe that there’s been another probate or “appointment proceeding concerning [the] decedent” in MN or somewhere else – be sure to include this data, too.

In cases where the decedent left behind a Will, you must also include the following information in your application to initiate a probate.

The location of the Will must be described. You need to state whether the Will is already in the court’s possession, is attached to your application or if you’re providing an authenticated copy of a Will that’s been probated in another jurisdiction;
Reference if the Will has been properly executed. Check to be sure all proper parties signed the Will and that it was duly witnessed and notarized;
Validity of Will statement. You must be able to truthfully state that you have no knowledge (after checking) – that the Will has been revoked;
Statement that you’re filing the application in a timely manner.

Keep in mind that, in Minnesota, applications for both informal and formal probate “must be initiated within three years after the decedent’s death.” Always check with your Minnesota probate attorney when you believe that there could be a challenge to the timeliness of filing the application.

Response to Your Application

You should be able to quickly learn if the probate registrar views your application as complete. Once this decision has been made, the registrar will issue a statement of probate and appoint a personal representative. After you have successfully filed an application for the informal probate of an estate, the registrar will allow the personal representative to pay debts and inheritances, and complete all of the other required tasks without court supervision. Be sure to ask your lawyer what other rules or procedures may apply if the personal property involved in your Minnesota estate is worth less than $75,000.

Should you need to review the types of documents often required during the probate process, please visit an earlier article of ours entitled, “The Most Useful Minnesota Estate Planning Documents.”

Free Initial Consultations

Contact the Flanders Law Firm today. The firm offers free consultations to all potential clients. Call (612) 424-0398.

Personal Representative Liability for Failure to Pay Probate Estate Taxes

Posted on January 26, 2015 by jlawyer

An important case was issued recently out of the Western District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, United State v. Stiles, No. 2:13-cv-00138.

This case provides and excellent explanation for why people should not administer estates (especially large ones) without the help of a lawyer.

Facts of the Case

Julia Stiles died in 2002. Her son was appointed executor (personal representative) of her estate (it is not clear whether he did so with the use of an attorney or not).

The tax return for the estate was not filed until June of 2008. On June 9, 2008, a representative of the Secretary of the Treasure Internal Revenue Service of the United States (IRS) assessed federal income taxes, interest, and penalties against the estate in the amount of $2,093,091. That is a lot of money in taxes.

The real property in the state of Delaware was sold in August 2002, for $379,000. Once the property was sold, the proceeds were distributed to the heirs shortly after the sale. The IRS did not receive any proceeds from the sale of the property.

Between 2002 – 2005, the son distributed approximately $775,000 from the estate to himself, and $425,000 to each of his two sisters. At the start of April 2008, the estate’s investment account was worth $1,787,660. In April of 2008, David Stiles distributed $110,635 from the estate to the Delaware Division of Revenue.

The IRS can Charge Interest on Late Payments

The IRS presented evidence to the court that interest was owed on unpaid income taxes. Interest on the income tax assessments is assessed under 26 U.S.C. 6601(a) and (b) from the date that the Stiles’ tax liabilities became due at a rate set forth in 26 U.S.C. 6621(a). Penalties are also allowed by federal law.

The law on failing to pay estate taxes

The IRS in this case filed for a summary judgment. In essence, this means that the IRS felt that the Stiles had not cognizable defense. The court agreed.

In seeking to foreclose its tax lien on the estate, the IRS argued in its summary judgment motion that there was a prima facie assumption of tax liability. Therefore, since the government had arguably met its burden, the Stiles had to file a responsive statement of facts. They did not do so – ostensibly because they did not appear to be represented by counsel.

Personal Representative Liability Law

The personal representative of the estate also argued that the estate was now insolvent and therefore the IRS could not foreclose in its tax lien.

The IRS argued that, because the personal representative of the estate was a fiduciary that it could hold him personally liable for the tax debt. The IRS cited law which provided that:

“Personal liability can attach, to the extent of the distribution, if the government establishes three elements: (1) the fiduciary distributed assets of the estate; (2) the distribution rendered the estate insolvent; and (3) the distribution took place after the fiduciary had actual or constructive knowledge of the liability for unpaid taxes.” United States v. Tyler, No. 10-1239, 2012 WL 848239, at *10 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 13, 2012). “

The court agreed with the IRS’s argument and found the personal representative liable for a tax debt in the amount of

What is even more confounding is that the personal representative admitted that he knew about the tax liability:

David Stiles admitted, through testimony, that he knew in 2002 about the estate’s federal tax liabilities. (ECF No. 35 ¶ 17); see Estate of Stiles, 2011 WL 5299295, at *6 (“[David] Stiles testified at trial that he knew as of 2002 that estate taxes would have to be paid in addition to the yearly fiduciary income taxes, but he made no affirmative efforts to pay those taxes or learn of the deadlines by which they should have been paid.”). On June 18, 2003, during a telephone call with his lawyer, David Stiles was informed that the estate’s tax returns were late. Estate of Stiles, 2011 WL 5299295, at *6. Based on the record before the court, David Stiles knew about the estates’ tax liability, at the latest, on June 18, 2003. David Stiles continued to distribute assets out of the estate through 2006.³ (ECF No. 35 ¶ 19.) The record before the court shows that David Stiles had knowledge of the estate’s tax liability and continued to distribute assets out of the estate rendering it insolvent. See Tyler, 528 F. App’x, at 200-02.

Finally, it appears that the personal representative was relying on a defense of bad legal advice. The court also did not find this argument compelling, providing that: “Relying on the poor advice from an attorney is not a defense. It is unfortunate that the Stiles received poor legal advice; however, poor advice does nothing to mitigate their liability for the decisions David Stiles made in managing the estate.”

Seek out competent legal counsel

Having experienced, competent probate attorneys for a Minnesota probate is a must. Personal liability is very real and must be taken seriously by all potential personal representative.

For further information, contact Joseph M. Flanders at 612-424-0398.

Everything You (Never) Wanted To Know About Disinheritance

Posted on September 8, 2014 by jlawyer

No one wants to think about ever having to disinherit a loved one, after all, doing so can create serious friction in the family and lead to irreparably hurt feelings.

However, there are some cases where disinheritance may be in order, in which case, it helps to be armed with information. To find out more about how it works in Minnesota, keep reading.

Minnesota Probate Law | Can you disinherit a spouse?

Though we’d hope it never gets to the point that you want to, it is possible you might be interested in disinheriting a spouse. Is such a thing possible in Minnesota? Fortunately (or unfortunately, as the case may be), spouses can never be disinherited in Minnesota. This is because your spouse has a legal right to his or her spousal share of your estate. This means even if you specifically leave assets to others and change your beneficiary designations, your spouse will still be able to claim a certain share of the value of the estate.

The rule in Minnesota says that a spouse has the right to a percentage of the augmented estate, meaning the value of your assets plus the value of his or her stuff. The percentage is based on a sliding scale and starts at three percent of the augmented estate for those married for only a year. At year 15 the percentage caps out at 50 percent of the augmented estate.

This percentage is guaranteed regardless of what is written in your will and, assuming the spouse has little of his or her own, will guarantee he or she walks away with half of your estate. If that’s a problem, you might want to consider meeting with a Minnesota family law attorney rather than an estate planning lawyer.

Minnesota Probate Law | What about children?

Though it’s hard to imagine why anyone would want to disinherit a child, the reality is that there are sometimes legitimate reasons for such a decision. One example is if there is simply no relationship between the parent and child and including the child in the will would run contrary to the person’s wishes.

A second, and much less depressing situation, is if one child is especially well off financially and does not need the same level of support as other children. By excluding the wealthy child from your inheritance you can leave more to the children who may really need it.

Unlike spouses, children can be disinherited. Doing so may obviously lead to hostility, especially if the disinheritance comes as a surprise. To ease the pain, it may be best to sit down with the family and explain your rationale for the decision early on, giving everyone time to process and, eventually, accept your choice.

How do you go about disinheriting someone?

If you’re looking to disinherit someone, likely a child, there are several ways to go about it. One way is to simply exclude their name from your will and all other documents regarding your estate. Don’t name them as beneficiaries on your life insurance or retirement accounts. Though this approach can work, it can also lead to confusion and unnecessary fighting. If someone is merely left out of a will, it’s possible that they would think it was the result of a simple oversight and could thus lead to a lengthy fight among the heirs.

Rather than allow for so much potential confusion, the better way to go about disinheriting someone is to specifically name him or her in your will and other estate planning documents. By including them by name and then stating that you wish to leave them with nothing, you are eliminating the possibility that this could be contested later on as vague. Your wishes, though harsh, will have been made unequivocally clear.

An experienced Minnesota probate lawyer can help walk you through the complicated process of establishing a workable estate plan. For more information on estate planning in Minnesota, along with a variety of other topics, contact Joseph M. Flanders of Flanders Law Firm at (612) 424-0398.
Source: “Disinheriting someone is not easy,” by Geoff Williams, published at Reuters.com.

See Our Related Blog Posts:

Minnesota Probate Law | When is Probate Necessary?

What’s a living trust and how does it work in Minnesota?